Author Archives:

A Choice to Fail: Voucher Schools Flunk LEAP And Johnny White Out?

It’s all about a choice. School choice rings from the hills as the clarion call from reformers. “Parents need a choice,” they say smugly, while counting their private foundation grant cash in their skinny jeans. And who could argue? Choice sounds great. It’s like Burger King: school anyway you want it. 

So some parents got a choice. Without information. With smug sloganeering about superior private schools, filled with visions of their children studying philosophy in wood-paneled prep academies. Instead, they got snowed in a White-out:

As Gov. Bobby Jindal tries again to fund his controversial school voucher program, new test scores indicate that many of the current students educated with public money in private schools are not thriving. Or at least they aren’t yet.

Released Wednesday, LEAP scores for third- through eighth-graders show only 40 percent of voucher students scored at or above grade level this past spring. The state average for all students was 69 percent.

For accountability purposes, students attending private schools at taxpayer expense take the same standardized tests as their peers in public schools. In 2011, when the voucher program operated only in New Orleans, students averaged 33 percent proficiency.

Now seven schools in Jefferson and Orleans parishes have results so low — less than 25 percent of voucher students proficient for three years running — that they have been barred from accepting new voucher students in the fall, as per state policy. In Orleans, the schools are Life of Christ Academy, the Upperroom Bible Church Academy, Bishop McManus, Conquering Word Christian Academy Eastbank and Holy Rosary Academy. In Jefferson, they are Faith Christian Academy and Conquering Word Christian Academy.

From failing schools to failing schools. A difference without a distinction. Choosing without a choice. And John White sees the writing on the wall. As the walls of Jindal’s Education reform sandcastle tumble down in the courts and legislature, White is out the door:

Rumors have persisted for several days now that White would be leaving his post at the end of the current legislative session, which must adjourn by June 6.

Those rumors reached a new pitch on Wednesday with word that White would be headed “for Duncanland” in June.

For those unfamiliar with the Obama cabinet, “Duncanland” would be Washington where Arne Duncan serves as Secretary of Education. Before joining the Obama administration, Duncan served as chief executive officer of the Chicago Public Schools whence controversial former Recovery School District Superintendent Paul Vallas came. White succeeded Vallas as RSD superintendent before being elevated to his current post by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) at the behest of Gov. Bobby Jindal in January of 2012.

BESE President Chas Roemer, contacted about the report that White was headed for Washington, said he had not heard any such report.

To the escape hatches! No ed reformer hack left behind!

Budgets Made Of Magic Beans

CB asks some very good questions about our State Budget.

  1. Q: For years we heard concerns about the state going over a “fiscal cliff.”

    This year that cliff was in the neighborhood of $1.2 Billion needed to maintain the status quo of state government.

    If the cliff has been addressed, I missed it.

     

  2. Q: We were told that even after the mid-year reductions,  the current year’s (FY13) budget had an approximate $80 Million shortfall due to certain projected revenues not materializing.

    The state constitution prohibits the state from incurring a deficit. The FY13 budget ends on June 30.

    If that shortfall has been addressed, I missed it.

     

  3. The Minimum Foundation Program (“MFP”) for FY13 was recently declared unconstitutional by the LA Supreme Court because the lege failed to properly approve it during the 2012 Regular Session.

    As a result, it is as though the FY13 MFP never existed.  When that happens the MFP reverts to the formula approved for the previous fiscal year.

    The previous year’s MFP provides for a 2.75% increase in funding if the FY MFP is not approved.   From what source is the additional 2.75% funded?

    The FY12 MFP contained no funding for Bobby Jindal’s statewide voucher program.  What happens to the money spent on the vouchers in FY13 that wasn’t authorized?

    If these two issues have been addressed, I missed it.

     

  4. Q: The FY14 budget is funded, in part, by $800 Million in projected savings from privatizing the former LSU hospitals.

    Other than for Lallie Kemp, I don’t believe that there is state funding for these state hospitals past October 31.

    Other than for Earl K. Long Hospital in Baton Rouge, I don’t believe any of the agreements for private providers to operate the hospitals have been signed.

    Without the agreements in place timely, funding for these hospitals will remain the responsibility of the state’s taxpayers.

    If we taxpayers have to pick up the tabs for any hospital after October, it seems that the lege will have to come back into a special session to address the matter before October 31.

    If this issue has been addressed, I missed it.

    Perhaps some lege can explain to me what happened to these fiscal issues.  I don’t want to be concerned needlessly about massive cuts in vital state services or massive tax increases in the near future.

    Can anyone help me see what I’ve missed?

     

In addition to those questions, we’ve got another couple for the Jindal Admin and the Legislature

  1. Where is the money coming from to pay off the unconstitutional voucher expenses? According to The Advocate, the state will owe $6m this month alone with no way to pay for it now that MFP is off the table. Oops. And Bobby the Boy Blunder is promising to continue to pay for the voucher program from general fund. Wow.
  2. Wasn’t the whole point of the hospital privatizations to save us money? Now we hear that the privatizations will cost $42m of employee costs this year. More money to conjure up for the Jindal Admin.

A hate-love relationship: Bobby Jindal and his special-interest lobbyists

Reblogged from Something Like the Truth:

  • Click to visit the original post

By Robert Mann

Come with me back to the good old days, when Gov. Bobby Jindal was a fearless crusader against the special interests and the obscene tax credits negotiated by their dastardly lobbyists.

Let us travel all the way to March 19, 2013.

Here’s what our modern-day St. George had to say in Houma as he pitched his erstwhile tax “reform” plan:

Read more… 919 more words, 1 more video

Lobbyists overboard one day, standing on his back the next! #DontStopBelieving in #Louisiana

Cassidy Trips Over Himself Defending Government Health Care

Bill Cassidy has a problem. And it’s not just Mary Landrieu’s formidable reelection machine. 

No, Bill Cassidy’s problem is that his career is born of a contradiction. On one hand, Dr. Cassidy is the affable, moderate liver specialist at Louisiana’s former public hospital in Baton Rouge, Earl K. Long.

On the other hand, politician and Senate-candidate Cassidy is robust opponent of “government-run” health care and President Obama’s Affordable Care Act (which of course is not government run health care, but rather an the incentivizing of care through the private market).

Squishy Bill Cassidy would like it both ways. He’d prefer to make political hay over his fist-shaking at the Federal Government. This kind of vacuous, empty rhetorical politics truly resonates with the blinded-by derangement tea-bagging set.  Their politics of resentment are conspicuously devoid of factual information or adherence to reality. But they sloganeer with the best of them. And their obsession with Obamacare as the scourge on the American soul is the most volatile political weapon they possess.

However, Cassidy is a creature of the beast. Instead of the imaginary Government-run health care system he admonishes, Cassidy emerges from the belly of the genuine article. 

Let us set this straight. The Charity System is Socialized Medicine. If we need to repeat, you’re not thinking hard enough.

Bill Cassidy has been a happy employee of the Louisiana socialized medical system for more than 20 years. Let him tell you himself:

Cassidy worked at “the Earl” for about two decades and developed a lot of “camaraderie” there.

“Do I have some mixed emotions? Absolutely,” Cassidy said.

The Earl K. Long had an “incredibly noble” mission of helping the underserved, Cassidy said. But over the years the patient lines continued to get longer and the medical center was “continually starved of resources,” he said.

“It often felt like it was our team against the world,” Cassidy added.

Politically, Cassidy opposes too much government-run health care and he also backs the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, often known as Obamacare.

“It’s a really complicated set of issues,” Cassidy said.

Cassidy bemoans the budget cuts (but, starve the government beast! Right Bill?) that his ideology prizes as its raison d’etre. His next statement is both laughably hypocritical and pointedly delusional as well:

Cassidy said. “One of the problems I have with government-run health care is when the government runs health care, the people don’t have power.

Cassidy’s civics might be a little rusty, since he’s been a government employee for so long, so let us resolve this logical quandary for Dr. Cassidy. The people elect the government. The Government runs health care (charity). Therefore, when the Government cuts Charity, the people are cutting Charity. Ergo, the people are in charge. Doc Cassidy complains of the symptom of his own ideological disease. When “conservative” politicians constantly and arbitrarily slash funding for health care, refuse to raise revenue or prioritize resources, and then privatize the public trusts, government health care doesn’t work.

So Bobby J, and presumably politician and Senate candidate Bill Cassidy want to privatize the hospitals. And will the people have a voice then?

Let’s go to the video tape:

Lawmakers are raising questions about whether the Louisiana State University hospital privatization agreements devised by Gov. Bobby Jindal’s administration provide enough public scrutiny of the hundreds of millions of dollars at stake.

And more:

Two state senators complained Friday that lucrative deals for private operation of LSU public hospitals lack provisions that guarantee public accountability.

State Sens. Ed Murray and Dan Claitor made their comments as the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget reviewed not-yet-finalized agreements for private operation of LSU hospitals in Lafayette and New Orleans as well as the $1.2 billion academic medical center under construction.

Meanwhile, committee Chairman Sen. Jack Donahue, R-Mandeville, pressed the Jindal administration for details on the short- and long-term state financial obligation for all LSU hospital takeovers including another six that are still in the works.

“You are a private enterprise taking over a major public purpose,” Murray, D-New Orleans, told hospital executives. “How do we audit those dollars?”

In other words, Doc, if you love our Charity Hospital Earl K. Long, you’re staring at its problem straight in the mirror everyday. 

Jindal’s Baton Rouge, DC

CB Forgotston is a Republican. A conservative Republican. But that hasn’t stopped his open war against the Jindalistas. He’s assailed Bobby on a number of fronts, probably most recently on his ill-fated tax reform idea. 

In his latest angle, Forgotston focuses on the transformation of the Capitol, into a with-us or against-us partisanship that comes straight from Washington, DC. And CB says it was imported by former Congressman Bobby Jindal:

The more I watch the goings on at the State Capitol in Baton Rouge, the more it looks like the U.S. Capitol in D.C.

It is preview of what a Bobby Jindal Presidency would look like. Despite what Jindal thinks and a few pundits say, thankfully, there will never be a Jindal Presidency.

Enter Jindal

Pre-Jindal, there was very little evidence of partisanship in the lege body. There were philosophical divides on issues rather than DC-style partisanship.

Jindal has moved the lege process from a discussion of issues to whether one is for or against Bobby.

Inconsistent philosophy

Because of Jindal’s consistent inconsistency it is impossible for lege to deal with him based on issues.

This session Jindal supported a billion dollar tax on businesses, but opposed a two cent tax on cell phones.

Jindal supported a $1.05 tax increase on cigarettes, but opposed much smaller ones.

Jindal has opposed the use of one-time money to fund recurring expenditures and now he supports the same.

I could go on, but it suffices to say that when it comes to fiscal issues Jindal has been solidly on both sides of every one.

There’s more where that came from.

Gone in 30 days: DOA ignores regulation which requires three-year retention of all public records, including emails

Reblogged from Louisiana Voice:

News reporters from other states are quick to point out that Louisiana has one of the strongest public records laws in the country. A New York reporter, for example, was surprised to learn that LouisianaVoice was complaining about a month’s delay in obtaining public records from the Department of Education (DOE) and Division of Administration (DOA).

“I have an FOIA (Freedom of Information Act; the equivalent to Louisiana’s R.S.

Read more… 1,043 more words

GOLD STANDARD FOR SECRECY!

Jindal's no racist, but when it comes to Medicaid, he whistles their tunes

Reblogged from Something Like the Truth:

Click to visit the original post

By Robert Mann

I'll stipulate that Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal is not a racist.

Nor are the Republican members of the House Health and Welfare Committee who Wednesday voted unanimously to reject billions in federal funds to expand the state's Medicaid program to the state's working poor.

But I do believe that Jindal and some opponents of Medicaid expansion are employing nasty racial stereotypes and ugly coded language to defeat it.

Read more… 1,182 more words

The delusional nature of the opponents of Medicaid expansion would be funny if it weren't going to cost lives.

Mary Landrieu Lands Impressive Fundraising Quarter

With the first major fundraising quarter under the belts, Senator Mary Landrieu continues to draw serious dollars to her campaign side. And most surprising, some of that money is coming from major Republican donors.

Landrieu, D-La., is announcing she raised about $1.2 million during the first three months of the year, which compares favorably with the more than $500,000 brought in by her only 2014 opponent thus far, U.S. Rep. Bill Cassidy, R-Baton Rouge.

Those dollars leave Landrieu with a $3.46 million war chest thus far compared with Cassidy’s $2.4 million, though the election is nearly 18 months away.

The $500k raised by Cassidy must be a disappointment to republicans, who were hoping their moderate nominee would draw strong interest from establishment conservatives seeking a new US Senator from Louisiana detached from the teabag crew.

Landrieu’s strong showing also included some interesting names:

Landrieu also promoted the support she has from top Republican donors, such as New Orleans developer Joe Canizaro and Lockport shipyard magnate Boysie Bollinger, who is a former state Republican Party chairman.

“Any challenger to Sen. Landrieu will have a hard time building support as more and more prominent business leaders back her,” Bollinger said in a prepared statement. “People know that at the end of the day, Mary always fights for our state. For me and many Louisianians, that’s more important than anything.”

The fracturing of conservative over Cassidy’s coronation and strong-arm tactics to clear the field continue to show that hardcore wingnuts aren’t buying into Cassidy’s weak tea moderation. Major GOP donors recognize this, and would rather have a Senior Senator with real pull that disagrees with them on issues than a Mary Landrieu-lite candidate like Cassidy.

Do states without an income tax really have the strongest economies?

Reblogged from Something Like the Truth:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

By Tom Swain
Guest Blogger

Governor Jindal wants to do away with state income taxes.  His earlier proposals attempted to raise an equivalent amount of revenue from sales taxes.  He now stresses his desire to end income taxes, but seems willing to let the Legislature find the replacement funding.

In his speech to the Legislature on Monday, he spoke about wanting people to stay in Louisiana, of wanting people to move here from states like Texas and Florida. 

Read more… 1,120 more words

Does it make any sense to eliminate the income tax? Only if you want to bankrupt the state.

Talking Points Memo: Jindal’s Political Collapse

So yesterday went well for the Governor, huh? Apparently all that tax-hiking talk was for naught, because he just got right up there and asked the legislature to go ahead and get rid of the income tax… and that’s it. Let’s not worry about replacing that revenue with a sales tax hike anymore.

His reasoning was basically, “My brother lives in another state, and he won’t come back until we get rid of the income tax. So do it for MY BROTHER!

Talking Points Memo took note of the larger context, and it wasn’t good for BJ or the GOP:

Governor Bobby Jindal (R-LA), considered a leading presidential contender in 2016, is suffering a political meltdown in his home state. His approval rating plummeted to 38 percent in a poll last week by the non-partisan Southern Media Opinion & Research, down from 60 percent just a year ago. In an ominous sign for national Republicans, the immediate cause is a sweeping economic agenda with strong parallels to the House GOP’s latest budget.

On Monday, Jindal scrapped his own proposal to eliminate the state’s income and corporate taxes and replace them with a statewide tax on sales and business services. His retreat was a concession to the reality that the proposal was headed towards a humiliating defeat — and taking Jindal down with it along the way. Jindal said in a speech to lawmakers that the backlash against his plan “certainly wasn’t the reaction I was hoping to hear,” but that he would respect the public’s wishes and start again.”

Read the whole thing here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,130 other followers

%d bloggers like this: