Iran

UPDATED: Vigil for Iran Protestors in Baton Rouge TONIGHT

by: ryan

Wed Jun 24, 2009 at 11:09:53 AM CDT

There's a vigil tonight in front of the LSU Student Union at 8 PM for the Iranian protestors. If you haven't been attention, I highly suggest you do so ... click here, here and here for the latest.

The picture at right is of Neda Agha Soltan, a 26 year old woman who was a woman who loved life ...

Travel was her passion, and with her friends she saved up enough money for package tours to Dubai, Turkey and Thailand. Two months ago, on a trip to Turkey, she relaxed along the beaches of Antalya, on the Mediterranean coast.

She also loved music, especially Persian pop, and was taking piano lessons, according to Panahi and other friends. She was also an accomplished singer, they said.

... who was never political until the votes of her and her countrymen were stolen.

So, if you can be there, be there. Tonight. At 8 PM. At the LSU Student Union.

UPDATE:A first-hand account, according to the The Guardian of the UK:

I only want to speak about what I have witnessed. I am a medical student. There was chaos at the trauma section in one of our main hospitals. Although by decree, all riot-related injuries were supposed to be sent to military hospitals, all other hospitals were filled to the rim. Last night, nine people died at our hospital and another 28 had gunshot wounds. All hospital employees were crying till dawn. They (government) removed the dead bodies on back of trucks, before we were even able to get their names or other information. What can you even say to the people who don't even respect the dead. No one was allowed to speak to the wounded or get any information from them. This morning the faculty and the students protested by gathering at the lobby of the hospital where they were confronted by plain cloths anti-riot militia, who in turn closed off the hospital and imprisoned the staff.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

On Looking Deeper, Or, Things About Iran You Might Not Know

by: fake consultant

Tue Jun 23, 2009 at 21:17:00 PM CDT

It has been an amazing week in Iran, and you are no doubt seeing images that would have been unimaginable just a few weeks ago.

For most of us, Iran has been a country about which we know very little...which, obviously, makes it tough to put the limited news we're getting into a proper context.

The goal of today's conversation is to give you a bit more of an "insider look" at today's news; and to do that we'll describe some of the risks Iranian bloggers face as they go about their business, we'll meet a blogging Iranian cleric, we'll address the issue of what tools the Iranians use for Internet censorship and the companies that could potentially be helping it along, and then we'll examine Internet traffic patterns into and out of Iran.

Finally, a few words about, of all things, how certain computer games might be useful as tools of revolution.

There's More... :: (1 Comments, 1922 words in story)

I'm Wearing Green

by: ryan

Sun Jun 14, 2009 at 18:53:36 PM CDT

I've changed the background color to green to join in solidarity with the people of Iran. For more background on what's happening there, click here, or check out Twitter under the heading #iranelection.

It's really sad to the see the depths that CNN, the supposed "leader" in world news, has sunk to. Apparently, the revolution will not be televised, but it will be twittered.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

McCain: Bringing Troops Home "Not Too Important"

by: ryan

Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 08:57:56 AM CDT

Hat Tip to Talking Points Memo

Jeebus. Republicans must be freaking out. Here's why:

Discuss :: (2 Comments)

Naive?

by: David Brignac

Wed May 21, 2008 at 20:07:01 PM CDT

Something quite ironic happens to me every day when I take in my daily dose of media propoganda. It seems that the talking heads increasingly want to discuss how naive Barack Obama is.  These are the same people that were the cheerleaders for the Iraq war.  

We are reaching a point in our nation's history where we are no longer the world's hegemonic power...... Other countries, which were on the periphery, are now a major presence. Among right wing thinkers, the idea exists that we will deal with these developing countries using our military.  We will force them into our ideology of democracy which somehow is automatically supposed to bring peace. That is exactly what has happened in Iraq right? A large part of society is able to recognize how naive this idea is. The names haven't changed people such as Wolfowitz, Cheney and Rumsfeld....this idea was able to survive due to the small scale at which we were fighting our satellite wars in South America.  These ideas have been around for decades. The current neo-cons are nothing new.  Technically the term neo-con, which they dubbed themselves somewhere along the line, is not even correct.  The proper term for these naive ideologues is neo-liberal. I will let that one soak in for a little while.  Conservatives or a neo-conservative policy would have never suggested invading Iraq.

We are clearly in a period where we are no longer able to impose our will as the sole superpower without challenge. We have reached a period where we are now one superpower among others.  This ensures less peace, less stability, and less legitimacy. This is nothing novel to historians.  It is simply what the Dutch experienced in the 17th century and the British in the 19th-20th centuries. We are now experiencing nation states such as India, China and Iran that have the necessary revenue base to develop mass military capabilities.  Our need to further capitalism has ultimately been the same force that has condemned our supremacy.  We have grown increasingly dependent on third world countries to produce mass goods at the cheapest rate possible.  The result is that foreign powers are strengthened. The idea that we can simply deal with these foreign powers by exhausting our military is truly naive.

Discuss :: (1 Comments)

LA-06: Interview with Don Cazayoux

by: ryan

Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 17:20:55 PM CDT

The Cazayoux campaign is releasing this web-only video about the race today:

It's also on their website. Don's candidacy has sparked a fire amongst the unions here in LA-06. While they've worked with political candidates before, I've never seen them this excited about a candidate. If you like the idea of adding to the Democratic majority in the House with someone who will be there with us on the economic issues we all care about, then donate.

I also had the opportunity to interview Don. I asked 10 questions, some of which came from calls I made for questions from commenters at Daily Kos, MyDD, and Daily Kingfish.

Let's get started!

    1. What's your background - where did you grow up, go to school, law school, etc?
    I grew up and have spent most of my life in Louisiana's 6th Congressional District. I grew up in New Roads, Louisiana - a small town founded in the 18th century that's famous for hosting the oldest Mardi Gras celebration outside of New Orleans. After graduating from high school in New Roads, I headed down the road to Baton Rouge to earn my BA and a Master's in Psychology from LSU. I earned my law degree from Georgetown in 1991.

    As a prosecutor, I never lost a jury trial and put hundreds of criminals behind bars. I prosecuted violent, petty and white collar criminals alike. I always stood up for the little guy. I even beat an insurance company in court when they refused to pay hospital bills for seniors.

    I was first elected to the Louisiana House of Representatives in 1999 and was one of the only freshmen appointed to the appropriations committee. In the legislature, I passed an increase in teacher pay, expanded early childhood education to include all at risk 4 year olds, and made historic investments in Louisiana's roads. I also passed tough ethics legislation that curbs the influence of lobbyists on the political process.

    2. Okay, let's get into the issues: First, there is a bill in the State Legislature, I'm not sure of the Bill #, but it will shorten the hours that the polls are open in Louisiana on Election Days. Are you for that or against it? (Hat Tip to wojeaux at Daily Kingfish)
    I believe that voting is a right of citizenship and we should protect it. There are lots of middle class people in Louisiana who work long or irregular hours and we should make sure that they have an opportunity to vote - that's why I will not support efforts to shorten voting hours. In Congress, I will support legislation that both protects the integrity of our elections and ensures that eligible citizens have an opportunity to participate.

    3. What is your stance on the current proposal for an I-10 loop around the Baton Rouge Metro area? If you are not sold on it, what alternatives are you prepared to put forward, if any?
    Traffic isn't just a nuisance - it also impacts our economy and our quality of life. The more time we spend in traffic, the less time we spend being productive and that's not good for the economy. It also means less time that we can be spend enjoying our kids, our parents and our grandparents. I support the I-10 loop because it'll reduce congestion and make it easier for Louisianans to reach their destinations.

    4. What is your position on wetlands loss in coastal Louisiana? Are you willing to step forward and LEAD on this issue, even if it means explaining that we need to spend a LOT of money, given that we face a potential catastrophe if the wetlands loss continues at its current pace? Do you have any specific policy ideas on this issue? (Hat Tip to darkhat at Daily Kos)
    For many Louisianans, conserving our wetlands is about preserving our quality of life. Louisiana's vast wetlands are a place where Louisianans have fished, hunted, trapped and lived for generations and we need to conserve this precious resource so that our children and their children can enjoy it. Our wetlands have also served as an important buffer against catastrophic hurricanes and that's yet another reason why it's important to protect them.

    There's no denying that we're losing wetlands. Our state has lost 1,500 square miles of wetlands since the 1930s and we're projected to lose up to 500 square miles more by 2050, if we don't act. In the Louisiana legislature, I coauthored legislation that allows certain federal revenues generated from Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas activity to be credited to the Coastal Protection and Restoration Fund. And, in Congress, I'll continue the fight to stop the loss of wetlands.

    The key to replenishing our wetlands is effectively managing the Mississippi River. We need to ensure that freshwater and sediments remain in the wetlands to bolster marshes and barrier islands instead of losing resources to the Gulf of Mexico. This necessary reform costs money and I will work to ensure that an effective and cost efficient wetlands management plan is in place and that Louisiana gets its fair share from the federal government for wetlands renewal.

    5. There are some progressive folks who are very disappointed in the language on your website about illegal immigration, as you are against amnesty. The policy that presidential candidate Barack Obama has advocated is to allow illegal immigrants who are in good standing (which I believe means if they were attempting to come in legally, they would not be barred from admittance under our immigration laws) to pay a fine, learn English, and go to the back of the line for the opportunity to become citizens, which is essentially the same stance that Hillary Clinton has on this issue. Do you agree with them? If no, where do you differ? (Hat Tip to populista at Daily Kos)
    I think everyone would agree that our immigration system is broken and we need to fix it. I also think that most Louisianans agree with me that amnesty is not the answer. Unfortunately, too many in Washington prefer gridlock and, as a result, nothing gets done. When dealing with illegal immigration, I believe that the first step is to pass laws that will both secure our border and crack down on corporations that knowingly hire illegal immigrants.

    6. Where do you stand on free trade agreements like CAFTA, NAFTA, and the current trade bill in limbo in Congress - the Colombian Free Trade Agreement? (Hat Tip to populista at Daily Kos)
    I support fair trade agreements that raise labor standards for all workers - both here in the United States and abroad - while ensuring that American businesses remain competitive. I will vote to close tax loopholes that reward companies for moving our jobs overseas. I oppose the Colombian Free Trade Agreement in its current form and believe that we need to renegotiate CAFTA and NAFTA to include more protections for our workers.

    7. Do you believe that we need to invade Iran, like some Republicans are proposing? (Hat tip to andydupre at Daily Kingfish)
    The current Iranian regime represents an extremist political ideology and is unpopular even in Iran. I believe that we must continue to put pressure on the current regime and simultaneously embolden Iranian moderates to bring about reform. At this moment, I am deeply concerned with their sponsorship of terrorist activities and while I believe that the military option should be the last option, I believe it's unwise to take any option off the table.

    I also believe that we must refocus our resources on combating al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations.

    8. If elected, would you keep the child tax credits and the lower tax brackets that help working class Americans? Would you vote to return the tax rate for the wealthiest 1% of Americans back to where it was under President Bill Clinton?
    I am a strong supporter of fiscally responsible tax cuts for middle class families. In the Louisiana legislature, I voted for millions in tax cuts for middle class families including an increase in the child tax credit. And, in Congress I will continue to support sensible tax relief for small businesses and middle class families.

    I am a real fiscal conservative and I believe that spending in Washington is out of control. Our deficit and national debt is unsustainable and it would be irresponsible to burden our children with our debts. As such, I believe in a balanced budget and I support pay-go policies that will reign in spending and make our government fiscally responsible.

    I also believe that corporations and the wealthiest 1% should pay their fair share. That's why I want to crack down on tax loopholes and offshore bank accounts that some use to cheat our tax system.

    9. On health care, you have stated that you would have voted for SCHIP, which would have expanded the program to allow 80,000 more of Louisiana's children access to health care. You want to reform the prescription drug plan for seniors - Medicare Part D. How do you propose lowering the costs of health care?
    I think President Bush's veto of the expansion of SCHIP was wrong for Louisiana families and I will vote to expand SCHIP so that children in middle class families can obtain health care coverage.

    On Medicare Part D, I believe that we need to eliminate the donut hole coverage gap and make sure that our seniors have access to the prescription drugs they need to live healthy and happy lives. In terms of controlling costs, I support allowing Medicare to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies to bring down the high cost of prescription drugs and save seniors and taxpayers money.

    Health care costs are out of control. One way to lower costs is by leveraging technology to make our health care system more efficient. Even polar political opposites - Newt Gingrich and Hillary Clinton - agreed on this point. Eliminating bureaucracy and improving the flow of health care information will help reduce costs for consumers. Another way to lower health costs is by making preventative treatments more widely available. Preventative medicine and early detection can save individuals - and our health care system - huge sums of money.

    Our health care system is too costly and doesn't help enough people. One major problem we face is that those who don't have health care use the costliest form - the emergency room. Increasing access to quality, affordable health care will drive down the cost of premiums for everyone.

    10. Republicans like to make a big show of how they are the better supporters of our troops and veterans. Yet every time a proposal to fully fund the VA, or to make it a non-discretionary item of the federal budget is before the Congress, Republicans have overwhelmingly voted no. Would you vote to make VA funding non-discretionary?
    I am a strong supporter of our troops and our veterans and I believe we have a fundamental obligation to make sure that the brave men and women who served in uniform have access to the health care they need and have access to programs that will help transition them back to civilian life.

    As for the VA funding issue, I will carefully review each budget and ensure that the VA has the funding it needs and that the money is getting to our veterans that need it - and it's not being wasted on unnecessary bureaucracy. As for the non-discretionary funding question, I would like more time to study proposed and past VA budgets before I take a position on non-discretionary funding.

I've got to say, Don was quite impressive. He's easily one of the more thoughtful candidates I've ever had the pleasure of meeting.

Also, this race is heating up. The Republicans have turned to a shadowy issue advocacy group run by former RNCC operatives called Freedoms Watch to get their message out, as the NRCC is strapped for cash. And Freedoms Watch? We have NO idea how much money they've got, nor whom their donors are, save the fact that they are a far-right wing group bent on promoting a far-right conservative worldview. Don is going to need every single cent he can raise to win this one.

Donate here.

Discuss :: (25 Comments)

John McCain: The Audacity of Gloom

by: ryan

Mon Feb 11, 2008 at 20:28:42 PM CST

Here's the text ...

The work that we face in our time is great
in a time of war
and the terrible sacrifices it entails
the promise of a better future is not always clear
there's gonna be other wars
I'm sorry to tell you there's gonna be other wars
there's gonna be a lot of combat wounds
and my friends it's gonna be tough
and we're gonna have a lot to do
That old Beach Boys song, Bomb Iran?
Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb...
I'm still convinced that withdrawal means chaos
and if you think that things are bad now
if we withdraw--you ain't seen nothing yet
was the war a good idea, worth the price in blood and treasure?
It was a good idea
President Bush talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years
Maybe a hundred, that's fine with me
I don't think Americans are concerned if we're there for a hundred years, or a thousand years, or ten thousand years.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)
ADVERTISING


Louisiana Progress Inform. Engage. Mobilize.

We need your support to keep the Kingfish going -- please donate today!





NATIONAL BLOGS
DailyKos
Media Matters
OpenLeft
Political Wire
Talking Points Memo
Vet Voice
Wonkette

LOUISIANA BLOGS
Acadiana and SW LA Dems
Bayou St. John David
CenLamar
democrat2democrat
Humid Beings
The Lens
Liberty and Justice for All
Library Chronicles
Yat Pundit
Your Right Hand Thief

Know Louisiana blogs that ought to be here?

Contact me

DEMS, ALLIES, ORGS
Calcasieu Parish Democrats
Lafayette Democrats
L.E.A.N.
L.L.B.C.
Louisiana Democrats
Louisiana Progress Initiative
New Leaders Council
Orleans Democrats


NEWS SITES
Advocate
Lafayette Independent
Times Picayune
Shreveport Times
Town Talk
News Star
Gambit Weekly
Jim Brown
Vermilion Today
Know Louisiana news sites that ought to be here?
Contact me
MEDIA

The Worst

Forgotten Crimes

No BP Bailout

Confronting Vitter

Doing a Vitter
CONNECT
MENU

New here? Join us!

Login Username:

Password:



Forgot username/password?
About The Daily Kingfish

join our list
* indicates required


WEB 2.0

Find us on Facebook

Subscribe to the Kingfish Feed!